Strategic Social is pleased to introduce the first in what will be a series of posts on the topic of “female jihadists.” The term “female jihadists” refers to women who are used to actively support violent extremist groups in the Islamic World, ranging from nationalist groups like the remnants of the Iraqi Baath Party, to Muslim Brotherhood-inspired groups like the Palestinian organization HAMAS, to Salafist-jihadists groups like Al-Qaeda. Strategic Social believes that understanding the role of female jihadists in supporting these groups is one of the keys to combating violent extremism around the world.
This first post will cover the subject of how certain Islamic principles have been applied to justify having women play an active role in jihadist organizations. Over time, Strategic Social will post additional analyses on other topics related to the phenomenon of female jihadists, including the following:
- The use of Islamic religious scriptures to recruit female jihadists;
- A comparison of female jihadists in the Israeli/Palestinian conflict and the war in Iraq;
- The use of female suicide bombers in the war in Iraq;
- Islamic religious authorities’ rulings (which are called “fatwas” in Arabic) related to female jihadists;
- Factors that make women susceptible to recruitment by jihadist organizations.
Strategic Social recognizes that this is a complex topic – one could probably write an entire book just on the debate over the word “jihad” and what it means. This series is not intended to be a comprehensive analysis of the phenomenon of female jihadists. Rather, our intent is more to raise awareness of the issues surrounding this phenomenon and the implications for policymakers and security officials.
There have been signs in recent years that violent extremist groups in the Islamic World are increasingly using female jihadists to advance their causes. One of the most visible and troubling signs of this development has been the use of women to carry out suicide bombings in Iraq. The first two female suicide bombers in Iraq appeared in the very early stage of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) in 2003, a few days before the Coalition Forces captured Baghdad. Radical insurgents have turned to this tactic because not only do such attacks provide a capability to inflict mass casualties and inspire fear in local populations, but also because female bombers are more likely to slip past security measures. Female suicide bombers have presented a particular problem, in spite of the general security gains achieved in Iraq in recent years, because the motivations of the women who become suicide bombers are often not well understood. There are a number of factors that can play into a woman making such a decision, but one of the most concerning reasons is the use of various interpretations of Islamic scriptures to encourage women to become suicide bombers. There is an entire chapter, the “Surat al-Nisa’a”, dedicated to the treatment of women in the Quran, the holy book of Islam, and one of the last recommendations of Prophet Mohammed before his death was for his followers to take care of mothers, wives and daughters, whom he described as fragile and delicate “phials.” These facts lead us to wonder whether female suicide bombers are active collaborators in violent extremist activities, or if they are victims.
To more thoroughly understand the role women play in supporting jihadist organizations and causes, we should first examine the meaning of the word “jihad.” “Al-Jihad fi sabil Allah,” or “striving in the way of God,” is a frequently used idiomatic expression that when studied in depth reveals that there are several meanings the word “jihad.” Though the most commonly accepted interpretation of “jihad” is some sort of violent struggle or military combat, the actual meaning of the word “jihad” really means something more akin to “struggle”, and in particular struggle against temptation and to improve one’s self and one’s society. This definition is often referred to as “the Greater Jihad.[i]” Some Muslims also refer to “Lesser Jihad[ii]”, which can refer to two things. The first of these is “Fardh A’yn”, which means “an individual’s duty”, in particular the duty of Muslims to protect Muslim lands and other Muslims from invasions by external powers through active participation in combat. There is also the form of “Lesser Jihad” known as “Fardh Kifaya” or “collective duty,” which refers to an obligation to support those who protect Muslims from invaders and occupiers in some way, but does not require an individual to participate in armed conflict.
In the early days of Islam, the participation of women in jihad was usually limited to raising and donating money in support of jihadist campaigns. Traditionally, a woman would have to receive the approval of the male head of the household, usually either her husband or her father, before engaging in any activities other than her regular household chores. Some jihadists have begun to issue new interpretations of how women can participate in jihad. In these interpretations, support for jihad is identified as an important Islamic duty, on par with such obligations as praying on a daily basis and fasting during the holy month of Ramadan. As such, it is something that a woman does not need a man’s permission in order to do.
However, most jihadist propaganda advocates that a women’s role in supporting jihad should generally take place within the context of traditional female roles within Islamic societies. A significant portion of jihadist propaganda[iii] advocates the position that women are the backbone of a well-bred, strong Islamic nation, and as such, traditional women’s roles as wife and mother are extremely important, and women can contribute to jihad within the context of these roles. For example, they can support jihad by running the household while her husband is away participating in jihadist campaigns in other parts of the world. They can teach their children about Islam and the obligations of jihad for Muslims, so that their children will become active in jihad when they grow up. They can convince their husbands that Islam obligates them to abandon their interest in world pleasures and risk their lives by enlisting in jihadist groups. These types of activities are portrayed as being the correct way for women to support the existence of Islam as a faith. If a woman wants to support jihad more directly, she is welcome to do so.
Some observers have mistakenly interpreted jihadists’ call for women to participate in the Lesser Jihad as a form of “liberation” for women. On the contrary, these jihadists tend to firmly state their disapproval of the Western values of liberating women, which they view as anathema to Islam. Instead, jihadists see the traditional roles played by wives and mothers as an important component of Islam, and see women’s participation in jihad as a natural extension of those roles, rather than as a challenge or a contrast to them.
Nowhere in the Quran does it explicitly say that it is acceptable for women (or men, for that matter) to carry out violent acts like suicide bombing. The fact that some jihadists are advocating such roles for women in violent jihadist campaigns is concerning because they tend to target and exploit women who are not particularly knowledgeable about Islam and who are not familiar with the subtleties of the various types and meanings of concepts like jihad. They expose an urgent need for policymakers in places like Iraq and Afghanistan to find ways to promote things like education and employment opportunities to help Muslim women feel more independent, more confident, and better able to make decisions for themselves–thus making them less susceptible to recruitment by violent extremists who base their appeals on questionable interpretations of Islamic principles.
We will provide further discussion of factors that make women in the Islamic World more susceptible to recruitment by violent extremists in future parts of this series.
[i] See this BBC piece and this essay by the late Grand Ayatollah Rullah Mousavi Khomeini for more background on the concept of “greater Jihad.”
[ii] Elena Mastors and Alyssa Deffenbaugh, The Lesser Jihad: Recruits and the al-Qaida Network, Roman & Littlefield Publishers, U.K. 2007
[iii] We apologize, but this source appears to only be available in Arabic.
————————————————————————————————————————————-
Dhafra Al-Azzawi is a Senior Analyst at Strategic Social. She produces analytic reports on political, economic, social, and military affairs in Iraq in support of Multi-National Force-Iraq (MNF-I) and Multi-National Corps-Iraq (MNC-I). Her areas of particular expertise include Iraqi insurgent and extremist groups, Iraqi political affairs, the history and theology of Islam, and developments in Iraqi and Pan-Arab media. Dhafra is a native Iraqi and lived in Iraq until 2005; as such, she witnessed firsthand all the wars that took in Iraq over the course of her lifetime, dating back to the start of the eight-year Iran-Iraq War. These experiences have given her outstanding insight into the changes that Iraqis have experienced in the economic, social, political, religious, and security environments as a result of these wars.
Dhafra holds an M.S. in Foreign Affairs and International Security from Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service, as well as an M.A. in English Literature and a Bachelor of Arts degree, with a minor in Psychology, from the University of Baghdad. As part of her studies for her Master’s degree at Georgetown, Dhafra took courses in subjects such as media and world affairs, terrorism and counterterrorism, security issues in the Middle East and the Persian Gulf, uses of and roles for intelligence in US foreign policy, and conflict prevention in international affairs. In addition to being a native Arabic speaker and being fluent in English, Dhafra is currently learning how to speak and read Farsi.
Prior to delving into the realm of international affairs, Dhafra worked as a professor at the University of Baghdad teaching courses in English Literature and Phonetics & Phonology, and she was the chairperson of the English Department at the Baghdad International School. From 2003-2004, she was the chief supervisor of the Coalition Provisional Authority’s (CPA’s) Facility Management Office, which was responsible for managing all publicly-owned property in Iraq, a veritable behemoth of a task, given the extent to which, under Saddam Hussein’s rule, the government and the ruling Baath Party controlled properties and industries. Dhafra also worked as a consular assistant at the US Embassy in Baghdad where she assisted with processing visa applications submitted by Iraqi nationals to come to the United States, and performed services such as interviewing applicants and certifying the authenticity of documents that they provided.
Dhafra has recently begun writing posts for Strategic Social’s blog, which covers developments related to new media/Web 2.0, international relations, irregular warfare, Information Operations, and Strategic Communications/Public Diplomacy. Dhafra is currently writing a series of posts on female jihadists in the Islamic World, which will cover topics such as how Islamic extremist groups use religion to recruit women, rulings by various Sunni and Shia religious authorities related to women’s participation in jihadist activities, and the use of female suicide bombers in Iraq.
{ 2 trackbacks }
{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }
This was a very powerful hard-hitting article that explores the motivations and the social context that gives rise to these horrible acts of desperation.
From a broader viewpoint, I wonder if suicide bombing has ever been an effective weapon. it might be argued that they do more harm than good for the causes of the bombers. The deadly kamikaze attacks by the Japanese during WWII convinced the Americans that bombing cities with conventional and nuclear weapons was the only way to defeat Imperial Japan. The deadly kamikaze attacks stiffened American resolve and forced the US to adopt desperate measures to end the war quickly. More recently, the suicide bombing campaign of the second Intifada did little to resolve Palestinian grievances, but resulted in a lot of carnage, lost opportunities, and senseless destruction. There is little support in the US for the Palestinian cause when we see their suicide bombers killing innocent people. Likewise, in Iraq, the repulsive, unrestrained brutality of the suicide bombers and their sponsors has stiffened American resolve to support Iraq until security has been achieved.
Suicide bombing is a weapon that the weak use against the strong – but there are better weapons and better methods. George Washington was able to defeat the world’s most powerful nation and achieve American independence without ever having to resort to such tactics. One of Washington’s most potent weapons was public opinion – shaped by a free press. The pen is mightier than the sword!!
Extremeist groups like Al Queda don’t understand this. They lost their focus in Iraq, and they missed their opportunity to seize the moral high-ground. They lost the propaganda war because their methods of jihad are immoral and utterly repugnant.
It seems the US should be as much on guard against women suicide bombers as the male ones.
This is the type of analysis that is sorely missing in understanding the motivations of diverse Jihadist movements in utilizing women – and in determining what roles they deem appropriate for women in furthering their extremist agendas. The context provided helped me better understand the thought process of those who manipulate Islam to support a twisted ideology. This reminds of countless past abuses of religion to support other horrific acts including slavery, massacres and wars. The authors description of the training (or brainwashing) of those too young and un-educated to protect themselves also draws interesting parallels to other mass movements that sought to exploit children (think Hitler Youth – Pioneers) and other vulnerable members in society. I look forward with great interest to future installments.
I read your entry on female jihadists. It must be difficult to probe the mind of someone who is so inaccessible to you, even though a woman. You cannot interview a female jihadist, you can’t email or call to ask questions. From where do you get the information to predict or describe their behavior and motivations?
Thanks for keeping me on your mailing list.
I went on to your blog and read your entry on female jihadists. It must be difficult to probe the mind of someone who is so inaccessible to you, even though a woman. You cannot interview a female jihadist, you can’t email or call to ask questions. From where do you get the information to predict or describe their behavior and motivations?
Thanks for keeping me on your mailing list.
Good question Sarah and thank you for your comment.
Since I was unable to personally hold one-on-one interviews with female Jihadists, I relied on research collected by Iraqi police investigations of detained female Jihadists who failed in detonating themselves at some point during their suicide operation.
My own encounter with the tribal system, as well as the psychological, religious and social atmosphere these women live through are also tools that play a part in my analysis. The rests of the articles that will appear on this blog over the next few months will discuss in more detail female Jihadists’ motives and methods.
Please keep in mind though that the objective of this series is to shed light on the importance of the issue through commentary and debated ideas that come from question just like the one you posted here. Only through such questioning can we expand current research in order to better understand the various factors that play a role in shaping female Jihadists’ rational.
What is jihad
First, we would like to start with stating that Islam does not call for violence; rather it abhors all forms of violence and terrorism, whether against Muslims or non-Muslims. Islam, moreover, calls for peace, cooperation, and maintaining justice, and provides for the happiness and welfare of humanity as a whole. This fact is declared in the Qur’an when Allah says: (Allah commands justice, the doing of good, and liberality to kith and kin, and He forbids all shameful deeds, and injustice and rebellion: He instructs you, that ye may receive admonition.) (An-Nahl 16: 90)
Jihad is one of the words that have been misused due to misunderstanding its true meaning. The word “Jihad” is derived from the Arabic word “Jahd” which means fatigue or the word “Juhd” which means effort. A Mujahid is he who strives in the Cause of Allah and exerts efforts which makes him feel fatigued. The word “Jihad” means exerting effort to achieve a desired thing or prevent an undesired one. In other words, it is an effort that aims at bringing about benefit or preventing harm.
Jihad can be observed through any means and in any field whether material or moral. Among the types of Jihad are struggling against one’s desires, the accursed Satan, poverty, illiteracy, disease, and fighting all evil forces in the world.
There are many religious texts that refer to these types of Jihad. Among the forms of Jihad is defending life, property or honor. Those who die while engaging in Jihad are considered to be martyrs, as confirmed by Hadith. Jihad is also done to avert aggression on home countries and on all that is held sacred, or in order to face those who try to hinder the march of the call of truth.
In Islamic Shari`ah, Jihad in the Cause of Allah means fighting in order to make the Word of Allah most high, and the means for doing so is taking up arms in addition to preparation, financing and planning strategies. A large number of people are supposed to take part in Jihad including farmers, craftsmen, traders, doctors, engineers, workers, security men, preachers, writers and all those who directly or indirectly participate in the battle.
This type of Jihad was a major concern of Muslims in the beginning of the formation of the Islamic community, and a lot of verses of the Glorious Qur’an and the Hadith advocated and encouraged it. Almighty Allah says: (March forth, whether you are light (being healthy, young and wealthy) or heavy (being ill, old and poor) and strive with your wealth and your lives in the Cause of Allah.) (At-Tawbah 9: 41) Jihad is considered an individual duty (Fard `Ein), on all Muslims who are capable and fit to fight, in the event of being invaded by the enemy, and is considered a collective duty (Fard Kifayah) in the event of not being invaded. However, if the Imam (leader) calls to Jihad, people must respond to his call. This is evident from Allah’s Saying, (O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allah (i.e. Jihad) you cling heavily on the earth?) (At-Tawbah 9: 38), and the Hadith narrated by Al-Bukhari and Muslim, “When you are called to Jihad, then go forth.”
learn quran online, learn quran tajweed